Kotun Koli ta bayyana cewa tsarin kudi na kyautar zamantakewar da aka kafa ta hanyar Dokar Dokar a cikin 2016 ya saba wa dokar Tarayyar Turai don nuna bambanci ga wasu kamfanoni a bangaren wutar lantarki da wasu.
Kyautar zamantakewa shine fa'ida ta yanayin zamantakewa da aka yi niyya don kare wasu masu amfani ("masu amfani da rauni") wanda ya ƙunshi ragi ga farashin wutar lantarki da ake cinyewa a mazauninsu na yau da kullun. Hukuncin Kotun Koli ya ƙayyade tsarin samar da kuɗin da aka ƙaddara don biyan kuɗin wannan rangwamen, in ba haka ba yana shafar ci gaba da aikace-aikacensa. A wasu ƙasashe na Tarayyar Turai, sun yi hasashen cewa za a fitar da wannan kuɗin daga kasafin kuɗinsu na gabaɗaya, amma Spain ta zaɓi tun da farko ta aiwatar da wannan wajibci ga wasu kamfanoni a fannin wutar lantarki.
Akwai lokutan da Kotun Koli ta yi la'akari da cewa tsarin samar da kudade da dokokin Spain suka kafa ya saba wa dokar Tarayyar Turai. Tsarin kudi ya sanar da cewa yanzu an tsara shi ta hanyar Royal Decree Law 7/2016, na Disamba 23, wanda ya sanya farashin sa akan "Kamfanonin iyaye na kungiyoyin kamfanonin da ke gudanar da ayyukan sayar da wutar lantarki ko kuma kamfanonin da kansu da suka yi. yi haka idan ba sa cikin kowane rukuni na kamfani”, wanda ke nufin ware kashi 94% na kuɗin tallafin ga kamfanonin talla. Wannan tsarin ba da kuɗaɗen, kamar na biyun da suka gabata, an sake la'akari da shi ya saba wa dokar Tarayyar Turai ta hukuncin Kotun Koli da aka sanar.
Kotun Turai
Hukunce-hukuncen sun ta'allaka ne kan hukunce-hukuncen kotunan shari'a ta Tarayyar Turai, musamman ma abin da aka bayyana a cikin hukuncin da ta yanke na baya-bayan nan na ranar 14 ga Oktoba, 2021 (Case C-683/19) wanda a ciki aka ce wajibai na hidimar jama'a, kamar su. wanda muke hulda da shi, dole ne a dora shi “gaba daya” kan kamfanonin wutar lantarki ba kan wasu takamaiman kamfanoni ba. A cikin wannan mahallin, tsarin ƙira don kamfanonin da ke kula da wajibcin sabis na jama'a ba zai iya ware kamfanoni masu fifiko waɗanda ke aiki a ɓangaren lantarki ba. Don haka, duk wani bambance-bambance a cikin jiyya dole ne ya zama barata da gaske. CJEU ta kara da cewa idan wata kasa memba ta zabi ta dora wa wasu kamfanoni kudaden da ke cikin wannan fanni ne kawai "... ya rage na kotu... don duba ko akwai banbanci tsakanin kamfanonin da dole ne su dauki nauyin nauyin. ya ce nauyi da kuma wadanda aka kebe daga gare shi ne da gangan barata.
Kotun koli ta yi nazari kan dalilan da ‘yan majalisar dokokin kasar suka yi amfani da su wajen kokarin aiwatar da odar ta a kan harkokin kasuwancin kamfanonin wutar lantarki, ban da kamfanonin da ke gudanar da harkokin wutar lantarki (generators, sufuri, dillalai) har ta kai ga cewa tsarin da aka kera na samar da kudade ya saba wa tsarin da aka tsara. zuwa labarin 3. 2 na Directive 2009/72/EC saboda ba shi da wani dalili na haƙiƙa kuma yana nuna wariya ga kamfanonin da suka ɗauki kuɗin, wanda za su biya kuɗin da aka biya a cikin aikace-aikacen tsarin da aka soke.
Hukuncin Kotun Koli ba ya shafar aikace-aikacen rangwame don kari na zamantakewa a cikin lissafin wasu masu amfani da rauni, amma ya ayyana tsarin samar da kuɗaɗen da ba zai dace ba.
